BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//talks.osgeo.org//qgis-uc2026//talk//Z8FWNS
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-qgis-uc2026-Z8FWNS@talks.osgeo.org
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20261005T110000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20261005T113000
DESCRIPTION:The narrative that the desktop is dying resurfaces regularly 
 – yet the same industry pushing SaaS centralisation is quietly rediscove
 ring local hardware as an "edge node" for computationally expensive AI wor
 kloads. This contradiction is worth unpacking: it reveals that the questio
 n is not desktop vs. cloud\, but rather who controls the compute and for w
 hose benefit.\n\nThis talk makes the case for QGIS as a first-class archit
 ectural component in modern geodata infrastructure. Using a structured SWO
 T analysis\, it compares QGIS against representative cloud-based GIS platf
 orms across four dimensions: processing performance on large vector and ra
 ster datasets\, extensibility through the plugin ecosystem\, deployment an
 d maintenance overhead\, and strategic dependency risk (vendor lock-in\, l
 icensing\, data sovereignty).\n\nConcrete examples ground the analysis: lo
 cal processing benchmarks for typical geoprocessing workflows (topology va
 lidation\, large-scale raster analysis)\, a comparison of customisation de
 pth between QGIS plugins and SaaS extension models\, and two deployment pa
 tterns that address common IT administration concerns – managed QGIS pro
 files and MDM-based rollout.\n\nThe talk closes with a practical framing f
 or hybrid architectures: where cloud services add genuine value\, and wher
 e local compute is not a legacy compromise but the technically and strateg
 ically correct choice.\n\nKey Takeaways\n- The edge-computing trend inadve
 rtently vindicates the local GIS client – and organisations should explo
 it this rather than defend against it.\n- QGIS's plugin ecosystem enables 
 domain-specific innovation that closed SaaS platforms structurally cannot 
 replicate.\n- Efficient desktop deployment is a solved problem\; the admin
 istrative objections are manageable and concrete mitigations exist.
DTSTAMP:20260724T192646Z
LOCATION:Pegna
SUMMARY:QGIS as an Edge Node: Arguments for the Local Desktop - Stefan Kell
 er
URL:https://talks.osgeo.org/qgis-uc2026/talk/Z8FWNS/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR