BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//talks.osgeo.org//T9LLQV
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-foss4g-2022-academic-track-T9LLQV@talks.osgeo.org
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20220825T123500
DTEND;TZID=CET:20220825T124000
DESCRIPTION:1.	INTRODUCTION\nIn a new initiative to deliver higher-quality 
 data and support improved geospatial analysis\, the U.S. Geological Survey
  (USGS) is upgrading the elevation and hydrography datasets into the 3D Na
 tional Topography Model (3DNTM)\, which will include fully integrated hydr
 ography and elevation. The USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) recently compl
 eted acquisition of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IfSAR) eleva
 tion data at 5-meter spatial resolution for Alaska (USGS\, 2022). Other pa
 rts of the United States are being mapped at higher resolution with lidar-
 derived elevation data. \n\nUnder the 3DNTM\, new hydrography data are acq
 uired through methods that derive or extract the features directly from be
 st available 3DEP elevation data to ensure proper integration of the hydro
 graphy and elevation layers. By applying specifications for deriving 1:24\
 ,000 or larger scale hydrography from high resolution elevation data (Arch
 uleta and Terziott\, 2020\; Terziotti and Archuleta\, 2020)\, a tenfold in
 crease in the number of features in the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD)
  is expected. Consequently\, highly automated machine learning methods to 
 extract and validate the hydrography data collection are being investigate
 d.\n\nXu et al. (2021) demonstrated that the U-net fully convolutional neu
 ral network (Ronneberger\, Fischer\, and Brox\, 2015) is capable of extrac
 ting hydrography from lidar elevation data with 80 to 90 percent accuracy.
  Stanislawski et al. (2021) applied a similar U-net model using several If
 SAR and IfSAR-derived input layers to predict hydrography for a 50-watersh
 ed study area in northcentral Alaska\, where 68 percent average F1-score a
 ccuracies were achieved on test watersheds. Further work to refine U-net p
 redictions of hydrography using IfSAR for the same 50-watershed area in Al
 aska achieved average F1-scores for test watershed of better than 80 perce
 nt (Stanislawski et al.\, 2022). Research presented in this paper builds u
 pon this earlier work by testing transfer learning methods and scaling-up 
 U-net predictions of hydrography from IfSAR for other areas of Alaska usin
 g workflows in high-performance computing environment. \n\n2.	METHODS\nA w
 orkflow was developed to automate downloads and processing of IfSAR-derive
 d tiles of digital elevation model (DEM)\, digital terrain model (DTM)\, a
 nd orthorectified intensity (ORI) data for user-selected watersheds from t
 he 3DEP database. The workflow mosaics common tiles and derives several ra
 ster data layers from the DEM that are related to surface hydrology\, such
  as topographic position index and shallow water channel depth. Overall\, 
 seventeen data layers are generated and coordinated with identical raster 
 projection systems. The layers were used in U-net modelling for predicting
  hydrography for the 50-watershed Kobuk River study area (Stanislawski et 
 al.\, 2022). In this study a transfer learning process begins with the Kob
 uk River U-net model and subsequently includes additional training data fr
 om outside the Kobuk area. Hydrography predictions are then generated from
  the transfer learning model and assessed. Several levels of refinements t
 o training data are tested and the accuracy of predictions are assessed. R
 eference data consist of vector hydrography features derived by USGS contr
 actors.\n\nThe data processing workflows are implemented with Python\, lin
 ux shell scripts\, and opensource software libraries such as the Geospatia
 l Data Abstraction Library (GDAL). Neural network modelling is implemented
  through TensorFlow\, and data processing is completed on a 12-node linux 
 cluster and through the GPU nodes of the USGS Tallgrass computing faciliti
 es (https://hpcportal.cr.usgs.gov/hpc-user-docs/Tallgrass/Overview.html).\
 n\n3.	DISCUSSION\nMapping hydrography for the state of Alaska is a dauntin
 g task\, given its vast area and terrain that is difficult to navigate. Bi
 g challenges with large high-quality datasets are well suited to take adva
 ntage of recent advancements in neural networks (Usery et al.\, 2021). Thi
 s research demonstrates the tremendous potential to improve and speed up m
 apping of surface water features in Alaska\, and elsewhere in the world ha
 ving challenging terrain and limited resources. \n\nReported accuracy scor
 es measure how well a machine can reproduce hydrography generated with met
 iculous editing by numerous subject matter experts. It is not a score of h
 ow well the surface water features are mapped by the model. The human fact
 or in contemporary broad scale mapping efforts cannot be ignored and warra
 nts consideration as a source of uncertainty in the related accuracy metri
 cs. How well the maps fit what is on the ground can only be definitively c
 onfirmed by being on the ground at any given point in time\, as hydrologic
  conditions are constantly in flux. Thus\, the work here could be used as 
 an aid to human cartographers in their efforts to interpret what is import
 ant to the map user. \n\nThis work could also benefit change detection eff
 orts. As new and better elevation data are collected\, automated strategie
 s such as the model presented here could be used to identify regions with 
 significant changes in surface water distribution. This type of automation
  would be valuable to maintain an accurate national map over time and help
  address the numerous challenges that society faces related to hydrology.
DTSTAMP:20260413T205250Z
LOCATION:Room Hall 3A
SUMMARY:Scaling-up deep learning predictions of hydrography from IFSAR data
  in Alaska - Larry Stanislawski
URL:https://talks.osgeo.org/foss4g-2022-academic-track/talk/T9LLQV/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
